Welcome to another trip down the rabbit hole from your
clever commie cunt in Chattanooga, Tennessee, in Neverland, author of the blog Notes from the Ninth Circle; just call
me Chuck. And, yes, that is a reference
to Dante; the name Hell’s Half Acre
was already taken when I began the blog in 2011.
When I saw the theme of this podcast, “The Gift”, the first
thing I thought of was the Season 5 finale of the TV show Buffy the Vampire Slayer, because that is the episode’s name. It’s related to n an episode earlier that
season called “Intervention” in which Buffy goes on a vision quest in the
desert and meets the First Slayer, who tells her, “Death is your gift”. As in, “Yea, though I walk through the valley
of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil…for I am Death, destroyer of worlds and slayer of men”. Or, in Buffy’s case, vampires.
The first time I heard the story of the Monkey Trap was when
I read Zen and the Art of Motorcycle
Maintenance when I was at uni. A
hunter cuts a hole in a coconut shell just big enough for a monkey’s hand to
fit in. Inside the coconut shell, the
hunter places some sort of food like a piece of fruit. The monkey comes along puts its hand inside,
grabs the fruit, but can’t get its hand out holding its prize. Thus it is trapped by its unwillingness to
recognize that it cannot both have and hold at the same time, that it cannot
have its fruit and eat it too. Its perceived
bounty, or privilege in some cases, is that which condemns it to the stew pot,
or, worse, to those tables with the little round hole in the top when the
halves slide together. In other tellings
of the story, the monkey holds onto the fruit until it dies, clinging to the
food that cannot be eaten until it starves to death.
While the story of the monkey trap is frequently used these
days by self-help motivational speakers, the same principle can be applied to
groups, movements, and parties. At this
point, I specifically mean socialists and other leftists. Comrades, the Russian Revolution is our fruit
inside the coconut. The October Revolution
itself was socialist, but what came after was most definitely not.
In her critique of the Bolsheviks called The Russian Revolution, Rosa Luxemberg
makes a statement in Chapter 6 that sums up the entire work: “Socialist
Democracy does not come as some kind of Christmas present for the worthy people
who have loyally supported a handful of socialist dictators”. After the Bolsheviks took power, all they did
vis-à-vis the Russian people was to trade one one tyrant three thousand miles
away, in social heirarchy if not in actual physical distance, for three
thousand tyrants one mile away, figuratively speaking again. Three thousands tyrants following the
dictates of a committee of just twenty.
Believe it or not,
one self-proclaimed socialist tried to tell me that Luxemberg actually praised
Lenin and Trotsky and the rest in her critique; I don’t think they understood
that that praise was that of Mark Anthony for Brutus.
Comrades, we
socialists need to follow the examples of Luxemberg, Maclean, Debs, Goldman,
and others contemporary to that time and let go of the delusion that the
Bolshevik leaders, all of them, established anything remotely resembling
socialism or building a path toward it. Under
Stalin, it was not a “failed workers state” because it had never been anything
of the kind. To those who prefer to lay
all the blame at Stalin’s feet for what the Soviet Union became, and he does
have the lion’s share of blame, I remind you that the very structures of which
he took advantage were those put in place by Lenin, Trotsky, Zinoviev, and the
rest.
And I mean all the
Bolshevik leaders; Lenin aborted the existent socialism in Russia to establish
state capitalism on the excuse that having socialism that early would violate
the protocol of a hypothesis first expounded by Engels and expanded upon by
himself. That is as absurd an action as
when the Communist Party of the Philippines ordered its newly-established New
Peoples Army from its homebase in the province of Pampanga in Central Luzon
where all its members spoke the local language, Kapampangan, to Cagayan Valley
in the northeasternmost province of the island of Luzon, where the local
language was Ibaneg. Their
rationale? To imitate Mao’s Long March,
since the party has recently adopted Maoism as its ideology.
As long as
socialists hold onto the idea that the Bolsheviks were genuinely socialist,
capitalists are going to have the coconut our hand is stuck in to beat us over
the head with. Or to simply let us
starve to death in obscurity. The
Bolsheviks were nothing more than slaves who dreamed of becoming masters and
then did.
On another topic,
let’s talk about voting. Specifically
here in Neverland, but the same principle applies everywhere. Way too many people after the November 2016
election claimed that “Donald Trump is not my President”. Well, tough fucking shit. He is.
Get the fuck over it. Voting is a
social contract that implies giving one’s consent that whomever wins the
election by the rules laid out at the time is the winner, provided the election
is fair. If you participate by voting,
you necessarily consent to the election of the winner. Otherwise, your vote is morally invalid. That doesn’t mean you can’t protest if the
winner is a racist, misogynist, bigoted, greedy, selfish, narcissistic asshole. But what it does mean is that everyone who
voted for someone other than Trump as well as those who voted for him consented
to his election.
So stop throwing
stones at Trump supporters in general; many voted for him simply because his
major opponent had less than nothing to offer and in many cases did not even
bother to ask for their vote. Commenting
on the Obama presidency someone stated that “American liberals would rather
have someone who makes them feel good about themselves than someone who
actually does good”. Which is certainly
true, seeing the way too many people cling to the Democratic Party as the “only
viable progressive option” to the Republicans, the lesser of two evils. But sugar on shit don’t make it a
brownie. Nonsocialist progressives need
to let go of the fruit in their own coconut.
And that is why so
many people voted for Donald Trump; he made them feel good about themselves,
even if they had misgivings about some of his other rhetoric. That is something that calling Trump
supporters “deplorables”, Bernie supporters “basement dwellers”, and Black
Lives Matter activists “not important” most certainly did not do for Clinton.
On the Electoral
College, I would point out that it did precisely what it was designed to do;
stop a candidate from winning by campaigning in just the states with the
largest, most concentrated populations.
Imagine if the UK had a nationally elected president and a candidate
standing for that office could win simply by campaigning almost exclusively in
London and Manchester, Glasgow and Edinburgh, Belfast and Derry, Cardiff and
Swansea. Clinton tried to win by
campaigning on the eastern and western coasts, ignoring the heartland almost
entirely.
Those casting stones at George Bush and Hillary Clinton for
being warmongers need to remember that Barack Obama signed the National Defense
Authorization Act containing a provision allowing the indefinite administrative
detention (a la Israel) of American citizens without charge in order to
continue the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, etc., dropping 26,000 bombs a years on
seven countries, and keeping up drone strikes on “anyone, anywhere on Earth, at
any time, for secret reasons based on secret evidence in a secret process undertaken
by unidentified officials” (Rosa Brooks).
Obama also initiated the upsurge in expulsions of illegal immigrants,
asylum seekers, and refugees that Trump had so greatly expanded. Just as Stalin couldn’t have been Stalin
without Lenin, Trotsky, Zinoviev, and the rest, Trump couldn’t be Trump without
Obama; in this, at least, he is following in the footsteps of his predecessor.
Finally, I want to add a few comments of my own on the
masculinists in the nationalist and, yes, socialist and progessive, movements
in Scotland. The masculinist, or “men’s
rights”, movement in America is the breeding ground from which the alt-right
movement sprang. The tiki torch Nazis in
Charlottesville? Those kind of people
came from there. If that is the company
you want to be inyou should start calling yourselves Friends of Trump. Or you can wake up to the fact that the same
system which has created the conditions which make you feel oppressed is
oppressing your female fellow humans even more, and turn your anger there. Let go of the fruit in the coconut.
Last of all, I want to say this: Be the darkness that illuminates. Be the silence that resonates. Be the stillness that agitates.
And remember: It's no better to be blinded by the light than by the dark.
Our day will come, inshallah. Keep the faith. Peace out.
No comments:
Post a Comment