26 April 2015

Your god is too small for my Universe

The title is an anonymous quote often misattributed to late 17th century monk and scientist Giordano Bruno.  Bruno had the temerity to posit that not only was the Earth not the center of the universe, but that the universe was infinite and there were countless planets with innumerable sapient and sentient species.  For which, of course, the Inquisition had him burned at the stake for heresy 17 February 1600.  His death marks the beginning of Western freethought.

What a puny little god humans worship.

By “god”, I refer primarily to the deity worshipped by the “Abrahamic” religions: Judaism, Samaritanism, Karaism, Christianity, and Islam.  However, it goes pretty much the same for any gods worshipped by any humans at any time since religion was invented.  This infinitesimally myopic viewpoint of the cosmos presents major problems in the face of the discoveries of the last and current centuries.  With its foundation crushed into dust, Terran religions need to reimagine their god into a form befitting the vastness of the universe as we know it today.

That this very juvenile planet Earth, a relative subquark in comparison to the vast expanse of the entire universe, is the center of attention for the deity or divine or supernatural force responsible for the whole kit and caboodle is pretty much the definition of exponential arrogance.  All Terran religions are geocentric; the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) go even further by being almost thoroughly anthropocentric.  Being a theist in this context necessarily means being a narcissist.  In our own image have we created God, as it were.

The Supreme Deity of the Israelites (Jews, Samaritans, Karaites), Christians, and Muslims was constructed in a cosmos nothing like the actually universe of which we have but an inkling even today.  This god, as we know him today, was invented by the Israelite ancestors of the modern-day Jews in a Canaanite landscape by a tribe of Arameans who after invading the Southern Levant adopted the dominant local language as their official political and religious tongue (Canaanite and ancient Hebrew are identical) and incorporated their tribal god into the local pantheon of deities. 

When they first appear on the scene, the Israelites were polytheistic, even if their polytheism was of the henotheist variety.  Archaeological and documentary evidence conclusively proves that the they remained so until well into the Persian period in the later fifth century BCE.  They adopted their monotheism from the Zoroastrianism of their Persian overlords but keeping their tribal deity, Yahuweh, as their main and later only god rather than trading him in for Ahura Mazda (Assara Mazas in Aramaic).

Per ancient Israelite cosmology, the universe, “ha-olam”, was divided earth, the sea, the heavens, and the underworld.  Earth, a circular disk, was in the center of everything.  The surface of the Sea surrounded the Earth, and under Earth was Sheol.  Across the Sea at the four corners of the earth were the Foundations of the Firmament, a dome holding back the waters above the sky from deluging the Earth.  Above the Firmament were said waters and the Gateway to Heaven.  Below Sheol were the Foundations of the Earth, and below these were the Great Deep.  That, my friends, was the total extent of the cosmos in which Yahuweh was conceived.

Furthermore, once merged into the cosmology of the surrounding Canaanite peoples, Yahuweh became one of the sons of El, of which there were seventy-two, one for each “nation” known to the Canaanites and their Israelite neighbors.  Some of these “sons of El” and other gods are mentioned in the Old Testament: the “Holy One” was a designation for Asherah, originally the wife of El and later adopted by the Israelites as consort of Yahuweh; El, or Elohim, originally the supreme father of all the “sons of El”; Elyon, usually translated as the “Most High”, was a title of Hadad, rival of Yam or Yaw with whom the Isaelites later identified their god Yahuweh.

Hadad is the deity most often referred to as simply “Baal”, which simply means “Lord”, though it was a title due to which all the “sons of El”.  The sixteenth verse of the second chapter of the Book of Hosea indicates that at one time the Israelites even used that title for their native deity, as in Baal Yahuweh (“And it shall be at that day, saith the Lord, that thou shalt call me Ishi; and shalt call me no more Baali.” KJV). 

The Elephantine papyri clearly shows that the Israelite military colony there worshipped not only Yahuweh but Anath (consort of Yahuweh), Bethel, and several other deities at their temple, including the Egyptian god Khnum, whose own temple was immediately adjacent.  Interestingly, the papers refer to the inhabitants of the colony as Arameans; history clearly demonstrates them to be the same people as the later Jews and Samaritans.

Shaddai, by the way, means Destroyer rather than simply Almighty, so maybe there was a kind of Shiva thing going on there.

Several archaeological sites in Palestine have clear temples or shrines to both Yahuweh and Asherah, including the pre-Assyrian conquest temple in the city of Samaria.  The later city of Jerusalem did not even exist until the misnamed “Second” Temple period; an urban center that did exist just a few kilometers away had monuments to both Yahuweh and Asherah.  This pairing is universal, occurring at every archaeological site in Palestine (or the Southern Levant, if you prefer) at which a “pre-exilic” Bet-Yahuweh (“House of Yahuweh”) has been identified.

Okay, so the Israelites were long-time polytheists.  The only real significant point here is that the Israelite universe was pretty tiny.  Their entire conception of the universe, what there was of it, was entirely focused on this planet.  Everything beyond Earth was mere background and window-dressing.  You can’t even say their solar system was geocentric because they had no conception of a “solar system”.  Not until well into the Ptolemaic period (rule of the Egypt-based Ptolemy dynasty), when they adopted the Aristotelian geocentric universe of seven planets arranged in concentric circles.

The god which the early Israelites developed fit their tiny universe very well, and it wasn’t very much of a stretch when some of their later descendants adopted the Aristotelian model.  The adjective “Ptolemaic” can also refer to noted scientist Claudius Ptolemy of second century CE Alexandria.  His model improved on that of Aristotle and was the one adopted by the Church.  In it, a spherical Earth was at the center, surrounded by concentric spheres of the planets Moon, Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, then the fixed stars, and finally the Primum Mobile). 

Muslim scholars shared this view of the universe with their European counterparts.  Both cosmologies, the ancient Israelite and the Aristotelian-Ptolemaic, are represented in the Talmud. 

So this god, or God, whom the ancient Israelites called Yahuweh and their rabbinic Judaist descendants call Lord or The Name, whom Christians call by a variety of titles, and whom Muslims (along with Arab-speaking Jews and Christians) call Allah, the God of the Tanakh, of the Bible, and of the Quran, held sway over a tiny, tiny area compared to the actual physical universe as we know it today.  The cosmology of all three religions, and indeed the theology, doctrine, dogma, and creeds of those religions, stands upon that foundation.

These three religions, as well as every other religion on Earth, are based on the idea that one group of one 200,000 year old race (subspecies) of one species on one 4.5 billion year old, 1.12 trillion km3 planet in one planetary system out of the possible 40 billion such capable planets in the Milky Way galaxy of 200 billion stars.  And that is just one galaxy among the estimated 500 billion in the Universe which itself is around 213 duovigintillion (69 zeroes) km3 in volume and 13.8 billion years old.

Shortly before his death, Carl Sagan asked, “How is it that hardly any religion has looked at science and concluded, ‘Wow, this is even better than we thought!  The Universe is much bigger than our prophets said, grander, more subtle, more elegant’?  Instead they say, ‘No, no, no!  My god is a little god, and I want him to stay that way!’.”

Truly, this god of the mythical Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Ishmael and of the historical Omri, David, Jesus, and Mohammad, this god defined and limited by the miniscule cosmos in which he was conceived, is too small for our actual universe and if not reimagined and expanded and redefined becomes reduced to little more than a petty local bully and tyrant.  Give me a god I can respect, a god I can believe in without feeling ridiculous, without having to suspend my disbelief and shutter away my rational mind and intellect.  Please.  Because I really do want to believe.

4 comments:

  1. Thank you sir, for I appreciate how you wield Biblical sources in a balanced way, as well as scientific. I am a believer, and I think when Carl Sagan said that our God is too small it was the among the most important things he left us to think about. The smallness of the Biblical God was, for me, easily explained a function of God disclosing to people only what they could understand at the time. Hence the Qur'an alludes to the future invention of modern vehicles as analogous to camels and horses, but does so only in a vague way. "We have given you ships and animals to ride on, as well as other things of which you have no knowledge...". Paraphrasing, but you can of course Google the exact reference yourself. God could not come out and talk about space shuttles or even automobiles explicitly, if they were not going to be invented for another 1300-1400 years after Muhammad. That would have scared people. So the Torah, Bible and Qur'an were revealed to people in terms they could understand during their respective centuries. That doesn't mean that God is small, but merely that he lowered himself to their level. But now that we have space telescopes, and know about the Big Bang, I do believe there is a way to rediscover a more accurate scale of God and the Universe. And that doesn't even require abandoning Judaism, Christianity or Islam. The Bible was revealed to men during King David's time, and even before that. That's approximately 1500-1000 BCE, whether you ask religious people or secular archeologists. Why should it have included details that we only understand now? Why should we even expect to? The lack of such modern details doesn't make it flawed. It only makes it appropriate to its initial audience. Perhaps God has been waiting for us to catch up to him, not the other way around? I think even Carl Sagan was only beginning to understand things in the 1970's.

    Happy to continue the conversation. I hope you find God. If he is indeed big enough to accommodate modern understanding of the scale of the universe, and yet still he cares about us, that is truly something awesome to be appreciated. It may be arrogance on our part to assume we are worthy of his time and attention, but maybe it is not. Maybe we are deserving of his love. If God exists, and he created the universe as we know it today, billions of light years across, and he still cares about humans living on this tiny little planet Earth 🌎🌍, that we should be saving from climate change by the way, then that actually makes us bigger. Perhaps, for those who say God doesn't care about us, their conception of humanity is too small.

    Happy to continue the conversation over email. Do not hesitate to contact me.

    Best regards,
    -A well meaning internet traveller who stumbled upon your blog one day in 2022

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, also I was born in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Your last name... Haha. Small world indeed for us Terrans.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I hope more people find this hidden gem of a blog post. Neil deGrasse Tyson, a hero of mine, misattributed that “Your God is too small” quote to Bruno in a talk he gave just the other day - which, upon investigating, is how I found this post and learned that the quote is misattributed! Even still, the concept of an outdated God that does not fully capture the magnitude, complexity, and splendor of our Universe is dissatisfying.

    The way I hear most speak about God… it always feels like they are talking about the God of Man, or the God of Earth. Why do we pray in such a way that insists God spare us his attention when he’s got an entire universe to tend to?? It seems that as the Catholic Church issued apologies for executions that had taken place 300 years prior, sects of Christianity quietly adopted “God is infinite” in a weak effort to “catch God up” to everything scientifically oriented humans had discovered!

    I could go on and on, but I’ll simply strongly agree with your frustrations about really wanting to believe in a higher power without feeling ridiculous and making logical concessions.

    ReplyDelete
  4. For future readers, I’ll make a footnote that my response is more reactionary and observationally rooted rather than supported by a strong foundation in the history of religion. I comment to agree with the points of OP and to air out my frustrations with modern religion (and spirituality).

    ReplyDelete