May
we love the Lord our God who is the One, with all our heart, with all our soul,
with all our mind, and with all our strength. May we love our neighbors
as ourselves. May we love our
enemies who hate us. And may we
love one another, Christ Jesus, just as you loved us. For there is no greater calling than to love. Amen.
Essays, commentary, videos, information about political events, freethought, social democracy, history, and anything else I feel like writing about. Poems too, and a few short stories.
26 April 2015
Your god is too small for my Universe
The title is an anonymous quote often misattributed to late 17th century monk and scientist Giordano Bruno. Bruno had the temerity to posit that not
only was the Earth not the center of the universe, but that the universe was
infinite and there were countless planets with innumerable sapient and sentient
species. For which, of course, the
Inquisition had him burned at the stake for heresy 17 February 1600. His death marks the beginning of Western
freethought.
What a puny little god humans worship.
By “god”, I refer primarily to the deity worshipped by the
“Abrahamic” religions: Judaism, Samaritanism, Karaism, Christianity, and Islam. However, it goes pretty much the same for any
gods worshipped by any humans at any time since religion was invented. This infinitesimally myopic viewpoint of the
cosmos presents major problems in the face of the discoveries of the last and
current centuries. With its foundation
crushed into dust, Terran religions need to reimagine their god into a form
befitting the vastness of the universe as we know it today.
That this very juvenile planet Earth, a relative subquark in
comparison to the vast expanse of the entire universe, is the center of
attention for the deity or divine or supernatural force responsible for the whole
kit and caboodle is pretty much the definition of exponential arrogance. All Terran religions are geocentric; the
Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) go even further by being
almost thoroughly anthropocentric. Being
a theist in this context necessarily means being a narcissist. In our own image have we created God, as it
were.
The Supreme Deity of the Israelites (Jews, Samaritans,
Karaites), Christians, and Muslims was constructed in a cosmos nothing like the
actually universe of which we have but an inkling even today. This god, as we know him today, was invented
by the Israelite ancestors of the modern-day Jews in a Canaanite landscape by a
tribe of Arameans who after invading the Southern Levant adopted the dominant
local language as their official political and religious tongue (Canaanite and
ancient Hebrew are identical) and incorporated their tribal god into the local
pantheon of deities.
When they first appear on the scene, the Israelites were
polytheistic, even if their polytheism was of the henotheist variety. Archaeological and documentary evidence conclusively
proves that the they remained so until well into the Persian period in the
later fifth century BCE. They adopted
their monotheism from the Zoroastrianism of their Persian overlords but keeping
their tribal deity, Yahuweh, as their main and later only god rather than
trading him in for Ahura Mazda (Assara Mazas in Aramaic).
Per ancient Israelite cosmology, the universe, “ha-olam”,
was divided earth, the sea, the heavens, and the underworld. Earth, a circular disk, was in the center of
everything. The surface of the Sea
surrounded the Earth, and under Earth was Sheol. Across the Sea at the four corners of the
earth were the Foundations of the Firmament, a dome holding back the waters above
the sky from deluging the Earth. Above
the Firmament were said waters and the Gateway to Heaven. Below Sheol were the Foundations of the Earth,
and below these were the Great Deep.
That, my friends, was the total extent of the cosmos in which Yahuweh
was conceived.
Furthermore, once merged into the cosmology of the
surrounding Canaanite peoples, Yahuweh became one of the sons of El, of which
there were seventy-two, one for each “nation” known to the Canaanites and their
Israelite neighbors. Some of these “sons
of El” and other gods are mentioned in the Old Testament: the “Holy One” was a
designation for Asherah, originally the wife of El and later adopted by the
Israelites as consort of Yahuweh; El, or Elohim, originally the supreme father
of all the “sons of El”; Elyon, usually translated as the “Most High”, was a
title of Hadad, rival of Yam or Yaw with whom the Isaelites later identified
their god Yahuweh.
Hadad is the deity most often referred to as simply “Baal”,
which simply means “Lord”, though it was a title due to which all the “sons of
El”. The sixteenth verse of the second
chapter of the Book of Hosea
indicates that at one time the Israelites even used that title for their native
deity, as in Baal Yahuweh (“And it shall
be at that day, saith the Lord, that thou shalt call me Ishi; and shalt
call me no more Baali.” KJV).
The Elephantine papyri clearly shows that the Israelite
military colony there worshipped not only Yahuweh but Anath (consort of
Yahuweh), Bethel, and several other deities at their temple, including the
Egyptian god Khnum, whose own temple was immediately adjacent. Interestingly, the papers refer to the
inhabitants of the colony as Arameans; history clearly demonstrates them to be
the same people as the later Jews and Samaritans.
Shaddai, by the way, means Destroyer rather than simply
Almighty, so maybe there was a kind of Shiva thing going on there.
Several archaeological sites in Palestine have clear temples
or shrines to both Yahuweh and Asherah, including the pre-Assyrian conquest
temple in the city of Samaria. The later
city of Jerusalem did not even exist until the misnamed “Second” Temple period;
an urban center that did exist just a few kilometers away had monuments to both
Yahuweh and Asherah. This pairing is universal,
occurring at every archaeological site in Palestine (or the Southern Levant, if
you prefer) at which a “pre-exilic” Bet-Yahuweh (“House of Yahuweh”) has been
identified.
Okay, so the Israelites were long-time polytheists. The only real significant point here is that
the Israelite universe was pretty tiny.
Their entire conception of the universe, what there was of it, was entirely
focused on this planet. Everything
beyond Earth was mere background and window-dressing. You can’t even say their solar system was
geocentric because they had no conception of a “solar system”. Not until well into the Ptolemaic period
(rule of the Egypt-based Ptolemy dynasty), when they adopted the Aristotelian
geocentric universe of seven planets arranged in concentric circles.
The god which the early Israelites developed fit their tiny
universe very well, and it wasn’t very much of a stretch when some of their
later descendants adopted the Aristotelian model. The adjective “Ptolemaic” can also refer to
noted scientist Claudius Ptolemy of second century CE Alexandria. His model improved on that of Aristotle and
was the one adopted by the Church. In
it, a spherical Earth was at the center, surrounded by concentric spheres of
the planets Moon, Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, then the fixed
stars, and finally the Primum Mobile).
Muslim scholars shared this view of the universe with their
European counterparts. Both cosmologies,
the ancient Israelite and the Aristotelian-Ptolemaic, are represented in the
Talmud.
So this god, or God, whom the ancient Israelites called
Yahuweh and their rabbinic Judaist descendants call Lord or The Name, whom
Christians call by a variety of titles, and whom Muslims (along with
Arab-speaking Jews and Christians) call Allah, the God of the Tanakh, of the
Bible, and of the Quran, held sway over a tiny, tiny area compared to the
actual physical universe as we know it today.
The cosmology of all three religions, and indeed the theology, doctrine,
dogma, and creeds of those religions, stands upon that foundation.
These three religions, as well as every other religion on
Earth, are based on the idea that one group of one 200,000 year old race
(subspecies) of one species on one 4.5 billion year old, 1.12 trillion km3
planet in one planetary system out of the possible 40 billion such capable
planets in the Milky Way galaxy of 200 billion stars. And that is just one galaxy among the
estimated 500 billion in the Universe which itself is around 213
duovigintillion (69 zeroes) km3 in volume and 13.8 billion years
old.
Shortly before his death, Carl Sagan asked, “How is it that
hardly any religion has looked at science and concluded, ‘Wow, this is even
better than we thought! The Universe is
much bigger than our prophets said, grander, more subtle, more elegant’? Instead they say, ‘No, no, no! My god is a little god, and I want him to
stay that way!’.”
Truly, this god of the mythical Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and
Ishmael and of the historical Omri, David, Jesus, and Mohammad, this god defined
and limited by the miniscule cosmos in which he was conceived, is too small for
our actual universe and if not reimagined and expanded and redefined becomes
reduced to little more than a petty local bully and tyrant. Give me a god I can respect, a god I can
believe in without feeling ridiculous, without having to suspend my disbelief
and shutter away my rational mind and intellect. Please.
Because I really do want to believe.
18 April 2015
A Universal Creed
I
am a Terran, a citizen of Earth. The
whole world is my home, and all its people my brothers, sisters, and
cousins of the One Human Race.
As a child of the Universe and an
instrument of peace, I will strive to bring love where there is hatred; pardon where
there is injury; union where there is discord; trust where there is doubt; hope
where there is despair; light where there is darkness; joy where there is
sadness.
May I seek to console more than
to be consoled; to understand more than to be understood; and to love more than
to be loved.
For it is in giving that we
receive; it is in pardoning that we are forgiven; and it is in dying that we
live. Amen. So say we all.
14 April 2015
What Must Be Said, by Gunter Grass
In honor of the great writer and poet Gunter Grass, I am publishing his poem here in his memory.
It's the alleged right to a first strike
What must be said
Why have I kept silent, held back so long,
on something openly practised in
war games, at the end of which those of us
who survive will at best be footnotes?
It's the alleged right to a first strike
that could destroy an Iranian people
subjugated by a loudmouth
and gathered in organized rallies,
because an atom bomb may be being
developed within his arc of power.
Yet why do I hesitate to name
that other land in which
for years – although kept secret –
a growing nuclear power has existed
beyond supervision or verification,
subject to no inspection of any kind?
This general silence on the facts,
before which my own silence has bowed,
seems to me a troubling, enforced lie,
leading to a likely punishment
the moment it's broken:
the verdict "Anti-semitism" falls easily.
But now that my own country,
brought in time after time
for questioning about its own crimes,
profound and beyond compare,
has delivered yet another submarine to Israel,
(in what is purely a business transaction,
though glibly declared an act of reparation)
whose speciality consists in its ability
to direct nuclear warheads toward
an area in which not a single atom bomb
has yet been proved to exist, its feared
existence proof enough, I'll say what must be said.
But why have I kept silent till now?
Because I thought my own origins,
tarnished by a stain that can never be removed,
meant I could not expect Israel, a land
to which I am, and always will be, attached,
to accept this open declaration of the truth.
Why only now, grown old,
and with what ink remains, do I say:
Israel's atomic power endangers
an already fragile world peace?
Because what must be said
may be too late tomorrow;
and because – burdened enough as Germans –
we may be providing material for a crime
that is foreseeable, so that our complicity
will not be expunged by any
of the usual excuses.
And granted: I've broken my silence
because I'm sick of the West's hypocrisy;
and I hope too that many may be freed
from their silence, may demand
that those responsible for the open danger
we face renounce the use of force,
may insist that the governments of
both Iran and Israel allow an international authority
free and open inspection of
the nuclear potential and capability of both.
No other course offers help
to Israelis and Palestinians alike,
to all those living side by side in enmity
in this region occupied by illusions,
and ultimately, to all of us.
Günter Grass
Translated by Breon Mitchell
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/apr/05/gunter-grass-what-must-be-said